Selasa, 10 September 2013

AHLULBAYTKU UMPAMA BAHTERA NUH, SIAPA YANG NAIK SELAMAT DAN SIAPA YANG TIDAK NAIK TENGGELAM (BINASA

                                                                




"لا اسألكم عليه اجراً الاّ المودّة في القربى "
NABI MUHAMMAD SAWW TIDAK MEMINTA SUATU APAPUN DARI KITA ATAS DAKWAHNYA KECUALI KASIH SAYANG KEPADA AHLULBAYTNYA

hsndwsp

Acheh - Sumatera

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tp7p30P_4OI&list=PL8t6K-KEoDoljPYjF7u4zmTAhiwBNc7sb


Billaahirrahmaanirrahiim 

Cinta kita kepada Keluarga Nabi saww (Ahlulbayt as) adalah cinta kita kepada Nabi saww itu sendiri, tanpa kecintaan kita kepada Ahlulbayt as maka kecintaan kita kepada Nabi saww tidak terhitung sebagai cinta, jika kecintaan kita kepada Nabi saww tidak ada maka mustahil kita bisa mencintai Allah swt, karena Nabi saww adalah orang yang paling Allah swt cintai dan kecintaan kepadanya adalah kewajiban bagi kita dari sisiNya. Karena Ahlulbayt adalah dari Nabi saww dan Nabi saww dari Ahlulbayt as maka kecintaan kepada Ahlulbayt adalah kewajiban dari kita. Cinta kepada Ahlulbayt as adalah keindahan. Cinta kepada Ahlulbayt as adalah kesuk sesan. Cinta kepada Ahlulbayt as adalah kemenangan. Cinta kepada Ahlulbayt as adalah "rizki" yang melimpah. Cinta kepada Ahlul bayt as adalah kedahsyatan energi. Cinta kepada Ahlulabyt as adalah kebaikan. Cinta kepada Ahlulabyt as adalah keselamatan. Cinta kepada Ahlulbayt as ada lah kebahagiaan. Cinta kepada Ahlulabyt as adalah keabadian. Cinta kepada Ah lulabyt as adalah keridhaan Allah swt.


Nabi saww adalah orang yang paling Allah swt cintai, dan Allah swt wajibkan bagi para makhluknya untuk mencintainya, dan Allah swt tekankan bahwa kecin taan kepadanya tidak ada gunanya tanpa kecintaan kepada keluarganya (Ahlul baytnya as).(قل لا اسألكم عليه اجراً الاّ المودّة في القربى ومن يقترفْ حسنةً نزد له فيها حسناً) {الشورى:23} Nabi saw bersabda: “sesungguhnya Allah swt telah menciptakan pa ra Nabi as dari pohon-pohon yang berbeda-beda dan menciptakanku dari pohon yang satu dan aku adalah aslinya/akarnya/pankalnya, Ali adalah batangnya, Fati mah adalah bunganya, Hasan dan Husain adalah buahnya, maka siapa yang ber gantung di salah satu ranting dari ranting-rantingnya maka akan selamat dan siapa yang menyimpang darinya maka akan jatuh dan celaka, walaupun telah beribadah antara shofa dan marwa selama seribu tahun kemudian seribu tahun lagi kemudian seribu tahun lagi kemudian tidak memahami perkataan kami maka Allah swt akan memasukkannya kedalam neraka” kemudian Nabi saww membaca ayat: “قل لا اسألكم عليه اجراً الاّ المودّة في القربى” hadis ini terdapat di kitab-kitab sunni (ahlu sunnah) seperti di Tarikh Demasyq 12/143 , di kitab syawahid al-Tanzil (2/203 hadis837) dan di kitab Kifayah al-Thalib:178 (h318 bab87). Nabi saww tidak meminta dari kita sesuatu apapun atas dakwahnya kecuali kecintaan kepada Ahlulbaytnya as, permintaan ini adalah kemuliaan bagi kita. Karena kecintaan kepada Ahlulbayt as adalah perintah Allah swt dan keridhaanNya.


Sebahagian catatan Hadist yang berhubungan dengan Ahlulbayt:


At-Thabarani dan lain-lain mengketengahkan sebuah Hadits yang bermaksud; “Belum sempurna keimanan seorang hamba Allah sebelum kecintaannya kepa daku melebihi kecintaannya kepada dirinya sendiri; sebelum kecintaannya kepa da keturunanku melebihi kecintaannya kepada keturunannya sendiri; sebelum ke cintaannya kepada ahli-baitku melebihi kecintaannya kepada keluarganya sen diri, dan sebelum kecintaannya kepada zatku melebihi kecintaannya kepada zat nya sendiri .”


Diriwayatkan oleh Ahmad dan At-Tarmizi dari `Ali as bahawa Rasulullah saww bersabda :”Barangsiapa mencintai kedua orang ini, yakni Hassan,Hussein dan ayah serta ibunya, maka ia bersama aku dalam darjatku di Hari Kiamat


Ibnu `Abbas ra berkata bahawa Rasulullah saww pernah bersabda : “Cintailah Allah atas kenikmatan yang diberikanNya kepadamu sekalian dan cintailah aku dengan mencintai Allah dan cintailah ahlul-baitku kerana mencintaiku”


Ad- Dailami meriwayatkan sebuah Hadits dari `Ali ra yang menyebut sabda Ra sulul lah saww: “Di antara kalian yang paling mantap berjalan di atas sirath ialah yang paling besar kecintaannya kepada ahlul-baitku dan para sahabatku.”


Hadits Thaqalain riwayat Zaid bin Al-Arqam RA menyebut : “Kutinggalkan di tengah kalian dua bekal. (Yang pertama): Kitabullah, di dalamnya terdapat pe tunjuk dan ca haya terang. Hendaklah kalian ambil dan berpegang teguh pada nya.dan (kedua) :Ahli Baitku. Kalian kuingatkan kepada Allah mengenai Ah li-Baitku! Kalian kui ngatkan kepada Allah mengenai Ahli-Baitku!”


Imam Ahmad bin Hambal meriwayatkan dalam Hadits lain: “Apabila bintang-bintang lenyap, lenyaplah penghuni langit; dan apabila ahli-baitku lenyap, lenyap pula penghuni bumi.”


Sebuah Hadits riwayat Al Hakim dan disahihkan oleh Bukhari & Muslim menyebut : “Bintang-bintang merupakan (sarana) keselamatan bagi penghuni bumi (yang sedang belayar) dari bahaya tenggelam/karam sedangkaan ahlul-baitku sarana keselamatan bagi umatku dari perselisihan (dalam agama). Bila ada satu kabilah Arab yang membelakangi ahlul-baitku, mereka akan berselisih kemudian menjadi kelompok Iblis.”


Hadits Rasulullah SAW dari Abu Dzar menyatakan :” Ahlul- baitku di tengah kalian ibarat bahtera Nuh. Siapa yang menaikinya ia selamat dan siapa yang ketinggalan ia binasa.”


Abu Dzar Al- Ghiffari RA menuturkan bahawa ia mendengar sabda Rasulullah saww: "Jadikanlah ahlul-baitku bagi kalian sebagai kepala bagi jasad dan sebagai dua belah mata bagi kepala.”


Hadits riwayat Imam At-Tarmidzi, bahawa Rasulullah saww telah bersabda : “Dunia tidak akan berakhir sehingga bangsa Arab dipimpin oleh seorang lelaki dari keluarga ku yang namanya menyerupai namaku. (baca Muhammad Mahdi al Muntazhar)
....................................

HADIST THAQALAYN IS THE FIRST THING SHOULD BE LEARNRD, IN ORDER YOU UNDERSTAND ABOUT THE ISLAM CLEARLY. IF NOT, YOU WILL BE WRONG PERSPECTIVE OBOUT THE AUTHENTIC MOSLEMS IN THE WORLD
hsndwsp
Acheh - Sumatra



Bismillaahirrahmaanirrahiim
Preface:
The Messenger of Allah - may Allah bestow peace and benedictions upon him and his Progeny - said: "Verily, I am leaving behind two precious things (thaqalayn) among you: the Book of God and my kindred (`itrah), my household (Ahl alBayt), for indeed, the two will never separate until they come back to me by the Pond (of alKawthar on the Judgement's Day)."

Imam Khumayni - ridwan Allah `alayh - began his wasiyyah or will with the mention of this tradition of the Prophet (S), known as Hadith alThaqalayn. In the prologue to his wasiyyah he pointed out that whatever tragedies and disasters befell the Muslim world during the last fourteen centuries have been mainly due to its estrangement from the Thaqalayn, the twofold legacy of the Prophet (S) in the form of the Qur'an and the Ahl alBayt (A).

The extent of the estrangement of the Qur'an will be obvious to anyone who closely examines its teachings and contrasts them with the popular religion of the masses and the prevailing religious ethos, even among the scholars and the intelligentsia. There is certainly a wide gulf that lies between the message and spirit of the Glorious Qur'an and the way Islam has come to be practised in Muslim society, a gulf which has never been so wide as it became in recent centuries under the influence of the West and the tyrannical regimes that have been ruling over Muslims.

The extent of the estrangement suffered by the Prophet's Household will be obvious to anyone who studies the history of the Imams of the Ahl alBayt (A), who were isolated from the Muslim masses by despots and left without support in their struggle against the tyrannical regimes of Banu Umayyah and Banu `Abbas.

The result was that the most authentic exponents and defenders of the Qur'an - whom the tides of time will never separate from the Qur'an until the Day of Judgement, as stated by the Noble Prophet (S) - were put under severe surveillance, exiled, imprisoned, poisoned and martyred, and the masses were deprived of their guidance and leadership.

Having removed the Ahl alBayt (A) from their way, the road was opened by the selfseeking tyrants for making the Holy Qur'an itself an instrument for the justification of their antiQur'anic rule. "They forced," as Imam Khumayni says, "the true exponents of the Qur'an... off the stage with various ploys and systematic plans. In this way, they in fact, eliminated the Qur'an itself, the Qur'an which was the greatest programme for organizing man's material and spiritual life, and rejected its plan of government based on Divine justice, which was and remains one of the ideals of this sacred scripture. Thus they laid the foundations of deviation from the Din and the Book of God, bringing things ultimately to an indescribable extreme."

If today the custodians of American Islam with their petrodollars conspire against the aspirations of the Muslim masses inspired by the genuine Islam, so did once the Umayyad and `Abbasid tyrants stand in the way of Islam and seek to isolate and destroy its exponents, the Imams of the Ahl alBayt (A), and promote a counterfeit version of Islam. But no matter how much they tried they could not extirpate the Prophet's exhortations regarding the Ahl alBayt and conceal the unbreakable link between the Book of God and the Prophet's `Itrah, in the form of Hadith alThaqalayn and scores of other traditions similar to it.

This hadith has continued to be narrated by each generation of authentic Shi`i and Sunni traditionists and scholars throughout the last fourteen centuries. Reliable and trustworthy narrators of each generation, from the days of the Prophet's committed Companions - may God be pleased with them - to the present, including many or rather most of the greatest and leading figures in the history of Islamic scholarship have narrated this hadith. It is in view of this undeniable fact that Imam Khumayni declared in his wasiyyah:

It is essential to point out that Hadith alThaqalayn is a mutawatir tradition amongst all Muslims. It has been narrated in Sunni sources - including the Six Sihah as well as other books - from the Holy Prophet (S) in different wordings, and as having been spoken by him on repeated occasions. This tradition is a definite proof (hujjah) for all mankind, in particular for the Muslims, regardless of sect. And all Muslims are answerable (before God) concerning it. For it leaves no room for any excuse for any one. And should there be room for an excuse for the ignorant and the uninformed, there isn't any for the scholars of various schools.

The Meaning of Tawatur:
As we know, the tradition or ahadith of the Holy Prophet (S) recorded in the books of Muslim traditionists begin with chains of transmitters on whose authority the traditionist reports the Prophet's acts or statements. Experts of hadith amongst Muslims have developed certain criteria for assessing the reliability of different chains of transmission and ascertaining the authenticity of the contents of traditions. They have developed a terminology with terms denoting various classifications of hadith depending on the character, strength or weakness of narrators and other factors, such as mutawatir, ahad, sahih, hasan, qawi, da`if, etc.

By tawatur is meant the multiplicity of the sources of a certain report that leads to certitude in the listener that the report is indeed true. One's knowledge of the existence of distant countries and towns and such historical figures as Cyrus or Napolean may be said to be based on the tawatur of reports that one hears about them. So also is one's knowledge of the contemporary events not witnessed by him.

A mutawatir hadith is one which has been reported by so many different chains of transmission and such a number of narrators in every generation as normally could not agree to fabricate a tradition without the fact of its fabrication becoming known. Although some jurisprudents have specified a particular minimum for the number of narrators, such as five, seven, ten or even hundred, it is generally held that no particular number can be specified and the number capable of producing certitude depends on the experience of the listener.

Islamic jurisprudents have set forth certain conditions for a tradition to be muta watir. AlGhazali in alMustasfa min `ilm al'usul [1] mentions the following conditions.
(1) That the transmitters should report on the basis of knowledge (`ilm) and not conjecture (zann).
(2) Their knowledge should have been acquired through the senses.
(3) That the number of narrators should be sufficient to produce certitude.
(4) That all the links in the chains of transmission of a report should fulfil the first two conditions and their number in every stage of transmission must fulfil the third condition.

Al Shaykh al Hasan ibn Zayn al Din, the Shi`i author of Ma`alim al'usul, men tions similar conditions for a report to be mutawatir. As can be seen, the legal condition of `adalah (justice) is not required for the narrators nor are they required to be thiqah when the conditions of tawatur are fulfilled. Rather, alGhazali states explicitly that in such cases knowledge is attained even if the narrators should be fasiq. The author of Ma`alim states two conditions in order for a mutawatir report to produce knowledge in the listener:

(1) The listener should not have previous knowledge of the matter, for it is not possi ble to know something that one already knows.
(2) The listener should not be inhibited by doubt or imitation (taqlid) in his belief, for then the report will fail to make any impression upon him.


Some Sahih Versions of the Hadith:
Hadith alThaqalayn is a mutawatir tradition which has been narrated - as we will presently see in our introductory study of `Abaqat al'anwar, a book written to establish the fact of its tawatur - through scores of different chains of transmission (turuq) only in the Sunni hadith corpus. If we add to these the Shi`i turuq of the tradition, the total number of its narrators becomes considerable.

Apart from being mutawatir, the hadith has been transmitted through several sahih turuq, that is, through chains in which all the transmitters are regarded as thiqah or as of confirmed trustworthiness and reliability. Following are four of these sahih narrations of the tradition as recorded by Muslim and alHakim alNayshaburi in their compilations:

(Muslim says:) Zuhayr ibn Harb and Shuja` ibn Makhlad narrated to me from `Ulayyah that he said: Zuhayr said: narrated to us Isma`il ibn Ibrahim, from Abu Hayyan, from Yazid ibn Hayyan, who said: "I, Husayn ibn Sabrah and `Umar ibn Muslim went to see Zayd ibn Arqam. When we sat down with him, Husayn said to him, 'O Zayd, you have been greatly fortunate. You have seen the Messenger of Allah, upon whom be Allah's peace and benedictions, heard his speech, fought with him in battles and have prayed behind him. Indeed, O Zayd, you have been enormously fortunate. Narrate to us what you have heard from the Messenger of Allah , may Allah's peace and benedictions be upon him.'

"Zayd said: 'O brother, by God, I have become aged and old and I have forgotten some of what I used to remember from the Messenger of Allah , upon whom be Allah's peace and benedictions. So accept what I narrate to you and as to what I don't, trouble me not regarding it.' Then he said: 'One day the Messenger of Allah , upon whom be Allah's peace and benedictions, addressed us near a pond called Khumm between Makkah and Madinah.

He praised God and extolled Him and preached and reminded (us). Then he said, "Lo, O people, I am only a human being and I am about to respond to the messenger of my Lord [i.e. the call of death]. I am leaving behind two precious things (thaqalayn) among you. The first of the two is the Book of Allah. In it is guidance and light. So get hold of the Book of Allah and adhere to it." Then he urged and motivated (us) regarding the Book of Allah . Then he said, "And my Ahl alBayt (family). I urge you to remember God regarding my Ahl alBayt. I urge you to remember God regarding my Ahl alBayt. I urge you to remember God regarding my Ahl alBayt"'" .... (Sahih Muslim, part 7, Kitab fada'il alSahabah [Maktabat wa Matba`at Muhammad `Ali Subayh wa Awladuhu: Cairo] pp. 122-123.)

(AlHakim says:) Narrated to us Abu alHusayn Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn Tamim alHanzali in Baghdad, from Abu Qallabah `Abd alMalik ibn Muhammad alRaqqashi, from Yahya ibn Hammad; also narrated to me Abu Bakr Muhammad ibn Balawayh and Abu Bakr Ahmad ibn Ja`far alBazzaz, both of them from `Abd Allah ibn Ahmad ibn Hanbal, from his father, from Yahya ibn Hammad; and also narrated to us Abu Nasr Ahmad ibn Suhayl, the faqih of Bukhara, from Salih ibn Muhammad, the hafiz of Baghdad, from Khalaf ibn Salim alMakhrami, from Yahya ibn Hammad; and Yahya ibn Hammad narrated from Abu `Uwwanah from Sulayman al'A`mash, from Habib ibn Abi Thabit, from Abu alTufayl, from Zayd ibn Arqam, may God be pleased with him, who said: "The Messenger of Allah , may God's peace and benedictions be upon him and his progeny, while returning from his last hajj (hijjat alwada') came down at Ghadir Khumm and ordered (us) towards the big trees, and (the ground) underneath them was swept.

"Then he said, 'I am about to answer the call (of death). Verily, I have left behind two precious things amongst you, one of which is greater than the other. The Book of Allah , the Exalted, and my `itrah (kindred). So watch out how you treat these two after me, for verily they will not separate from each other until they come back to me by the side of the Pond.' Then he said 'Verily, Allah , the Almighty and the Glorious, is my master (mawla) and I am the master of every believer (mu'min).' Then he took `Ali, may God be pleased with him, by the hand and said, 'This (`Ali) is the master of whomever I am his master. O God, love whoever loves him and be the enemy of his enemy."

(AlHakim adds:) "This hadith is sahih in accordance with the conditions of sihhah laid down by the Shaykhayn (alBukhari and Muslim), although they have not recorded it in its full length." (AlHakim says:) The first tradition (mentioned above) is supported by this one narrated by Salamah ibn Kuhayl, from Abu alTufayl, which is also sahih according to the requirements of alBukhari and Muslim. Narrated to us Abu Bakr ibn Ishaq and Da`laj ibn Ahmad alSijzi, both of them from Muhammad ibn Ayyub, from al'Azraq ibn `Ali, from Hassan ibn Ibrahim alKirmani, from Muhammad ibn Salamah ibn Kuhayl, from his father, from Abu al-Tufayl, from Ibn Wathilah that he heard Zayd ibn Arqam, may God be pleased with him, say:

"The Messenger of Allah , may Allah 's peace and benedictions be upon him and his progeny, came down at a place between Makkah and Madinah near the trees with five big shades and the people swept the ground under the trees. Then the Messenger of Allah , may God's peace and benediction be upon him and his progeny, began to perform the evening prayer. After the prayer he began to address the people. He praised God and extolled Him, preaching and reminding (us), and said what God wanted him to say.

Then he said, 'O people! Verily, I am leaving behind two matters (amrayn) among you if you follow them (the two) you will never go astray. These two are: the Book of God and my ahl albayt, my `itrah.' Then he said thrice: 'Do you know that I have more right over the believers (Inni awla bi almu'minin) than they over themselves?' The people said, 'Yes.' Then the Messenger of Allah , may Allah's peace and benedictions be upon him and his progeny said, 'Of whomever I am his master (mawla) `Ali also is his master.'"

(al'Imam al-Hafiz Abu `Abd Allah alHakim alNaysaburi, alMustadrak `ala al-Sahi hayn [Dar alMa`rifah li alTiba`ah wa alNashr: Beirut), vol. iii, pp. 109-110). (Al Hakim says:) Narrated to us Abu Bakr Muhammad ibn alHusayn ibn Muslim, the faqih of Ray, from Muhammad ibn Ayyub, from Yahya ibn al-Mughirah alSa`di, from Jarir ibn `Abd alHamid, from alHasan ibn `Abd Allah alNakha`i, from Muslim ibn Subayh, from Zayd ibn Arqam, may God be pleased with him, who said:

"The Messenger of Allah , may Allah's peace and benedictions be upon him and his progeny, said, 'Verily, I leave behind two precious things amongst you: the Book of Allah and my ahl albayt. Verily, the two will never separate until they come back to me by the side of the Pond.'"

(AlHakim says:) This hadith is sahih al'isnad according to the conditions laid down by the Shaykhayn (alBukhari and Muslim), though they did not record it. (alHakim, op. cit., vol. iii, p. 148) These are four versions of the tradition narrated on the authority of Zayd ibn Arqam. Their sihhah (authenticity) is confirmed by two of the great Sunni Imams of hadith. In addition, as we will see in our study of `Abaqatal'anwar, the tradition has been narrated by more than thirty Companions of the Prophet (S) and a host of narrators and leading traditionists of every generation up to the contemporary era.

The Various Occasions Related to Hadith alThaqalayn:
The various narrations of Hadith alThaqalayn also indicate the occasion on which the Prophet (S) proclaimed it publicly. `Allamah `Abd al-`Aziz Tabataba'i, who has studied the various narrations of Hadith al-Thaqalayn as recorded by various traditionists mentions four occasions on which the Prophet (S) proclaimed it publicly. First of these is the occasion when the Prophet (S) proclaimed it during his last hajj at `Arafat.

On this occasion, the Prophet (S) was accompanied by more than a hundred thousand Muslims. The second occasion relates to his proclamation at Ghadir Khumm, during the course of his return journey to Madinah. The third occasion relates to his proclamation in the Mosque of Madinah. The fourth one relates to his pronouncement of Hadith alThaqalayn in his chamber during his last illness. All these occasions lie within a period of ninety days and pertain to the Prophet's last days.

There are, however, many narrations of the hadith - in fact, most of them - which do not contain any clue about the time and place of its pronouncement. In the following are given instances of the narrations of Hadith alThaqalayn relating to each of these occasions, accompanied by the sources which record them. [2]

1. At `Arafat
AlTirmidhi in his Sunan (v, 662, no. 3786) records the following tradition
....Jabir ibn `Abd Allah said: "I saw the Messenger of Allah - upon whom be God's peace and benedictions - in the course of his hajj pilgrimage on the day of `Arafah. The Prophet (S) was seated on his camel, alQaswa', and was delivering a sermon. I heard him say: 'O people, I am leaving among you that which if you hold on to you shall never go astray: the Book of Allah and my kindred, my household." AlTirmidhi states that the same tradition has been narrated by Abu Dharr, Abu Sa`id, Zayd ibn Arqam and Hudhayfah ibn Usayd.


Among others who have recorded this tradition are:
alHafiz Ibn Abi Shaybah, as in Kanz al`ummal (1st ed.), i, 48;
al`Uqayli in alDu`afa' alKabir, ii, 250;
alHakim alTirmidhi, Nawadir al-'usul, 68, 50th asl;
alTabarani, alMu`jam alkabir, iii, 63, no. 2679;
alKhatib, alMuttafiq wa almuftariq, cf. Kanz al`ummal, i, 48 and Majma' alzawa'id, v, 195; ix, 163, x, 363, 268;
alBaghawi, al-Masabih, ii, 206;
Ibn al'Athir, Jami` al'usul, i, 277, no. 65;
al-Rafi`i, alTadwin, ii, 264 (in the biographical account of Ahmad ibn Mihran alQattan; this hadith has been deleted in the Indian print, but is present in the manuscripts of the book ! );
alMizzi, Tahdhib alkamal, x, 51, and Tuhfat al'ashraf, ii, 278, no. 2615;
alQadi alBaydawi, Tuhfat al'ashraf;
alKhwarazmi, Maqtal alHusayn (A), i, 144;
alKhatib alTabrizi, Mishkat almasabih, iii, 258;
Ibn Kathir, Tafsir (Bulaq edition, on the margin of Fath albayan), ix, 115;
al-Zarandi, Nazm aldurar alsimtayn, 232;
alMaqrizi, Ma`rifat ma yajib li Al alBayt alNabawi, 38.

2. At Ghadir Khumm:
AlNasa'i in his alSunan alkubra, 96, No. 79, records the following tradition in the chapter "Khasa'is `Ali":  Al Nasa'i narrates from Muhammad ibn alMuthanna, he from Yahya ibn Hammad, from Abu 'Uwwanah, from Sulayman, from Habib ibn Abi Thabit, from Abu alTufayl, from Zayd ibn Arqam, who said, "When the Messenger of Allah (A) returned from the last hajj and came down at Ghadir Khumm.... 


"Then he declared: 'I am about to answer the call (of death). Verily, I have left two precious things (thaqalayn) among you, one of which is greater than the other: the Book of God and my `Itrah, my Ahl alBayt. So watch out how you treat them after me. For, indeed, they will never separate until they return to me by the side of the Pond.' Then he said, 'Verily, God is my master (mawlaya) and I am the wali of every believer.' Then he took `Ali's hand and declared, 'To whomever I am his wali, this one is also his wali. My God, befriend whoever befriends him and be hostile to whoever is hostile to him.'" Abu alTufayl says: "I said to Zayd, 'Did you hear it from the Prophet(S)?' He replied, 'There was no one in the caravan who did not see it with his eyes and hear it with his ears,'" 

Khasa'is `Ali is part of alNasa'i's alSunan alkubra as shown by the 3rd volume of the MS in the king's collection in Morocco, written in 759/1358 folios 81-117. See also in this regard the introduction of alKhasa'is (Kuwait: Maktabat alMu`alla, 1406), ed. by Ahmad Mirayn Balushi. The editor states that this tradition is sahih and its transmitters are thiqah.
Among others who have recorded it in their books are:

Al-Bukhari, alTa'rikh alkabir, iii, 96;
Muslim, Sahih, bab fada'il `Ali, no. 2408;
Ahmad, Musnad, iii, 17, iv, 366;
`Abd ibn Humayd, Musnad, no. 265;


Ibn Sa`d, and Abu Ya`la from Abu Sa`id, as mentioned in Jam` aljawami` and Kanz al`ummal; Ishaq ibn Rahwayh, in his Sahih., as mentioned by Ibn Hajar in alMatalib al`aliyah, iv, 65, no. 1873, where he states that its isnad is sahih, and also by al-Busayri in Ithaf alsadah (MS in Topcopi Library, vol. 3, F.55b) who, too, considers the isnad as sahih; Ibn Khuzaymah, Sahih, MS in Topcopi Library, F.240; alDarimi, Sunan, ii, 310, no. 2319; Abu Dawud, Sunan, as mentioned in Sibt ibn alJawzi, Tadhkirat khawass al'ummah, 322; Abu 'Uwwanah, Musnad, as mentioned in alShaykhani, alSirat alsawi; alBazzaz, from Umm Hani, as mentioned in Wasilat alma'al; Ibn Abi 'Asim, Kitab alSunnah, 629, no. 1551, 630, no. 1555, 629, no. 1551;


alYa`qubi, Ta'rikh, ii, 112; alBaladhuri, Ansab al'ashraf, 110, no. 48, the biographical account of `Ali (A); alHafiz alHasan ibn Sufyan alNasawi, the author of Musnad, from Hudhayfah ibn Usayd, as mentioned by Abu Nu`aym, alHilyah, i, 355, alFasawi, alMa`rifah wa alta'rikh, i, 536; Ibn Jarir alTabari, from Hudhayfah ibn Usayd, Zayd ibn Arqam (with alNasa'i's wording as well as with the wording of Muslim), Abu Sa`id alKhudri, as cited in Jam` aljawami`, ii, 357, 395, Kanz al-`ummal, 12911, xiii, 36441, 36340, 37620, 37621, 36341, Jami` al-'ahadith, vii, 14523, 15112, 15122, 15113, iv, 7773, 8072, 8073; alDulabi, alDhurriyyat altahirah, no. 228;


alHafiz alTahawi, Mushkil al 'athar, ii, 307, iv, 368; alHakim alTirmidhi, Nawadir al-'usul, from Hudhayfah ibn Usayd; alTabarani, alMu`jam alkabir, iii, 2679, 2681, 2683, 3052, v, 4969, 4970, 4971, 4986, 5026, 5028; alHakim, alMustadrak `ala alSahihayn, iii, 109, 110 where he expressly states, as mentioned above, that the tradition is sahih in accordance with the criteria of alBukhari and Muslim; alDhahabi has confirmed his judgement; Abu Nu`aym, Hilyat al'awliya', i, 355, ix, 64; alBayhaqi, alSunan alkubra, ii, 148, vii, 30, x, 114; alKhatib, Ta'rikh Baghdad, viii, 442; Ibn alMaghazili, Manaqib Amir alMu'minin (A), 23; Ibn `Asakir, Ta'rikh Dimashq, ii, 45, no. 547, the biographical account of `Ali (A), and v, 436 of Badran's edition in the biographical account of Zayd ibn Arqam; alBaghawi, Masabih alSunnah, ii, 205 and Sharh alSunnah (MS in Topcopi Libary, vol. 2, F. 718), bab Manaqib Ahl alBayt; Ibn al'Athir, Usd alghabah, iii, 92 in the biographical account of 'Amir ibn Layla, no. 2727; Ibn Hajar, al'Isabah in the biographical account of 'Amir;


al-Mizzi, Tuhafat al'ashraf, iii, 203, no. 3688 from Muslim and alNasa'i; alDiya' alMuqaddisi, alMukhtarah, as cited by alSamhudi and alSakhawi; Ibn Taymiyyah, Minhaj alSunnah, iv, 85; al-Dhahabi, Talkhis alMustadrak, iii, 109; Ibn Kathir, alBidayah wa alnihayah, v, 209, vi, 199, from alNasa'i, where he quotes alNasa'i's statement that this narration is sahih; alKhazin, Tafsir under verses 42:23 and 3:103;
alMulla, Wasilat almuta`abbidin, v, 199; al-Haythami, Majma` alzawa'id, ix, 163 from Zayd, 164 from Hudhayfah.

3. In the Mosque of Madinah:
Ibn `Atiyyah in the introduction of his tafsir, alMuharrar alwajiz, i, 34 records the following narration: ...It is narrated that he (i.e. the Prophet) - upon whom be peace - said in the last sermon that he delivered during his illness: "O people, I leave behind two precious things (thaqalayn) amongst you...: the Book of God - which is a rope between Him and you, whose one end is in His hand and whose other end is in your hands so act according to its muhkamat and believe in its mutashabihat; consider as lawful that which it regards as lawful and consider as forbidden that which it regards as unlawful - and my `Itrah and my Ahl alBayt, who are the second thaql. So don't outstrip them (fa la tasbiquhum ), for then you shall perish."


Unfortunately in the printed versions of it fa la tasbiquhum has been altered as fa la tasbi`uhum (a meaningless expression). This tradition has also been narrated by: A bu Hayyan in his tafsir, alBahr almuhit, i, 12 (with identical wording, except that in a published version of it there is fa la tasubbuhum, i.e. so don't curse them, instead of fa la tasbiquhum); Ibn Hajar, alSawa`iq almuhriqah, 75, 136; Yahya ibn alHasan, Akhbar alMadinah with his isnad from Jabir, as cited in Yanabi` almawaddah, 40.

4. In the Prophet's Chamber During His Last Illness:
Ibn Abi Shaybah, as cited by Al`Isami in Simt alnujum al'awali, ii, 502, no. 136, has narrated the following tradition: The Messenger of Allah (S) said during his last illness: "Soon I am going to pass away and I have extended to you my plea of excuse. Lo, verily I leave behind amongst you two precious things: the Book of Allah , the Almighty and the Glorious, and my kindred (`Itrah)." Then he took `Ali's hand and raised it, saying, "This `Ali is with the Qur'an and the Qur'an is with `Ali. The two will not separate until they return to me by the Pond. Then I will ask the two as to how they were treated after me."


Among the narrators of this tradition are:
alBazzaz, Musnad, as mentioned in Kashf al'astar, iii, 221, no. 2612; Muhammad ibn Ja`far alRazzaz, from Umm Salamah (where she is explicit that the Prophet [S] made this pronouncement in his chamber which was filled by the Companions), as cited in Wasilat alma'al; Al'Azhari, Tahdhib allughah, ix, 78; alKhatib alKhwarazmi, Maqtal alHusayn (A), i, 164, from Ibn `Abbas; Ibn Hajar, alSawa`iq almuhriqah, 89, from Umm Salamah.


Abaqat al­'Anwar:
Among Sunni authors one who has written a book on the topic of the chains of transmission (turuq) of this tradition is al­Hafiz Abu al­Fadl Muhammad ibn Tahir al­Maqdisi (448 ­ 507/1056 ­ 1113), known as Ibn al Qaysarani as mentioned by the biographers (Isma`il Pasha in Hadiyyatal­`arifin (ii, 82), al­'Ansab al­muttafiqah and al­Jam` bayn rijal al­Sahihayn [Hyderabad]). [3]

However, the most exhaustive study of the subject is the one undertaken by al­'Imam Sayyid Hamid Husayn Lakhnowi ­ quddisa sirruh ­ in the twelfth part of his great work `Abaqat al­'anwar fi imamat al­ 'A'immat al­'athar. Sayyid Hamid Husayn (1246 ­ 1306/ 1830 ­ 1888) wrote this work in Persian as a refutation of the seventh chapter of Tuhfeh­ye ithna `ashariyyah of Shah `Abd al­`Aziz al­Dehlawi (1159 ­ 1239/1746 ­ 1823).

In twelve chapters of this work, which is said to be a plagiary in Persian of al­Sawa`iq al­mubiqah by an obscure writer Nasr Allah al­Kabuli, Shah `Abd al­`Aziz severely attacked Shi`i doctrines, beliefs and practices. Shah `Abd al­`Aziz's book was an effort to check the expanding influence of Shi'ism, which had begun to flourish under the patronage of the Shi`i kingdom of Awadh and under the religious leadeship of the great Shi`i scholar and mujtahid Sayyid Dildar `Ali ibn Muhammad Mu`in al­Naqawi al­Nasirabadi (116 ­ 1235/1752 ­ 1819), known as Ghufran Ma'ab.

Shah `Abd al­`Aziz's attack and accusations drew a massive response from Shi`i scholars. `Allamah `Abd al­`Aziz Tabataba'i mentions the following authors who wrote refutations of Tuhfeh­ye ithna `ashariyyah: [4] 1. Sayyid Dildar `Ali al­Naqawi al­Nasirabadi, who wrote five books refuting various chapters of the Tuhfah: al­Sawarim al­'ilahiyyat fi qat` shubuhat `abid al­'Uzza wa al­Lat (1215/1800), a refutation of the fifth chapter of the Tuhfah regarding theological issues; Khatimat al­Sawarim, a refutation of the seventh chapter concerning the Shi`i doctrine of Imamate; Husam al­'Islam wa siham al­malam (Calcutta, 1215/1800), a refutation of the sixth chapter of the Tuhfah concerning prophethood; Ihya' al­Sunnah wa imatat al­bid`ah bi ta`n al­'asinnah (1281/1864), a refutation of the eighth chapter of the Tuhfah; al­Zulfiqar, a refutation of the twelfth chapter. 

2. Shaykh Jamal al­Din Abu Ahmad Mirza Muhammad ibn `Abd al­Nabi Akbarabadi (d. 1232/1816), who wrote Sayf Allah al­maslul `ala mukharribi Din al­Rasul, in six big volumes, as refutation of all the chapters of the Tuhfah.

3. `Allamah Mirza Muhammad ibn 'Inayat Ahmad Khan Kashmiri Dehlawi (d. 1235/1820), who wrote Nuzhat al­'Ithna `Ashariyyah fi al­radd `ala al­Tuhfat al­'ithna `ashariyyah in twelve volumes, of which the first, third, fourth, fifth and seventh volumes were published (1255/ 1839) and others remained incomplete. 

4. Mawlawi Hasan ibn Aman Allah Dehlawi `Azimabadi (d. c. 1260/ 1844), who wrote Tajhiz al­jaysh li kasr sanamay Quraysh, as a refutation of all the chapters of the Tuhfah. 
5. `Allamah Sayyid Muhammad Quli ibn Sayyid Muhammad Husayn Lackhnowi Kanturi (d. 1260/1844), father of Sayyid Hamid Husayn, who wrote five books in refutation of different chapters of the Tuhfah: al­Sayf al­nasiri on the first chapter, Taqlid al­maka'id (Calcutta, 1262/1846) on the second chapter, Burhan al­sa`adah on the seventh chapter, Tashyid al­mata'in li kashf al­dagha'in in two volumes (1283/1866) on the tenth chapter, and Masari` al­afham li qal` al­'awham. 

6. Mawlawi Khayr al­Din Muhammad Allahabadi, who wrote Hidayat al­`Aziz (or Hadiyyat al­`Aziz) as a refutation of the fourth chapter of the Tuhfah about usul al­hadith and rijal.
7. `Allamah Sayyid Muhammad ibn Sayyid Dildar `Ali (d. 1284/ 1867) known as Sultan al­`Ulama', who wrote two books, one in Persian and the other in Arabic, in refutation of the seventh chapter of the Tuhfah concerning Imamate, of which the former was entitled al­Bawariq al­mubiqah. He also wrote Ta`n al­rimah in refutation of the tenth chapter. 
8. Sayyid Ja`far Abu `Ali Khan ibn Ghulam `Ali Musawi Banarasi, who wrote Burhan al­sadiqin and Mahajjat al­Burhan (a condensation of the former) in refutation of the seventh chapter and Taksir al­sanamayn in refutation of the tenth chapter. 

9. `Allamah Sayyid Mufti Muhammad `Abbas Musawi Tustari Jaza'iri (d. 1306/1888), who wrote al­Jawahir al­`abqariyyah in refutation of the Tuhfah's seventh chapter. 
10. Al­Shaykh Ahmad ibn `Ali Kirmanshahi (d. 1235/1819), who wrote Kashf al­shubhah `an hilyat al­mut`ah (MS dated 1227 H. in the National Museum, Karachi), in refutation of the ninth chapter. However, the most important work that was written as a refutation of the seventh chapter of the Tuhfah conceming the Shi`i doctrine of Imamate was `Abaqat al­'anwar, which was destined to take its place not only as the greatest work on Imamate ever written but also perhaps as one of the greatest masterpieces of scholarship ever compiled on a doctrinal issue anywhere in the history of religion. 

In the seventh chapter of the Tuhfah, where Shah `Abd al­`Aziz attacks the Shi`i doctrine of Imamate, he claims that the Shi`i claim is based on only six verses of the Qur'an and twelve traditions of the Prophet (S). Accordingly, Sayyid Hamid Husayn wrote his book in two sections, the first concerning the Qur'anic basis of Imamate and the second concerning its basis in the Prophet's hadith. The first section has not been published. The second section consists of 12 parts, each of which deals with the sanad (chains of transmission) and the meaning (dalalah) of one of the twelve traditions of the Prophet (S) concerning `Ali ibn Abi Talib (A) or the Ahl al­Bayt (A) rejected by Shah `Abd al­`Aziz as supporting the doctrine of Imamate. 

The first part studies the isnad and dalalah of what is called Hadith al­Ghadir. [5] It is contained in three volumes, of which the first was published in 1293/1876, in 1251 pages and the remaining two, of 609 and 399 pages, in 1294/1877. The second part deals with Hadith al­Manzilah. [6] It appeared in 1295/1878 in 977 pages. The third part deals with Hadith al­Wilayah. [7] It was published in 1303/1885 in 585 pages. The fourth part deals with Hadith al­Tayr. [8] It was published in 1306/1888 in two volumes of 512 and 224 pages from Matba`ah­ye Bustan, Lucknow. 

The fifth part deals with Hadith Madinat al­`ilm. [9] It consists of two volumes, of which the first, in 745 pages, appeared in 1317/1899 and the second, in 600 pages, in 1327/1909. The sixth part deals with Hadith al­Tashbih. [10] It was published in 1301/1883 in two volumes of 456 and 248 pages. The seventh part, which deals with Hadith al­Munasabah [11] and was completed by Sayyid Muhammad Sa`id ibn Sayyid Nasir Husayn ibn Sayyid Hamid Husayn, has not been published yet. The eighth part, dealing with Hadith al­Nur, [12] was published in 1303/1885 in 786 pages by Matba`ah­ye Mashriq al­'anwar, Lucknow. The ninth part, dealing with Hadith al­Rayah, [l3] has also remained unpublished. The tenth part dealing with the hadith... (al-haqqu ma`a `Aliyyin wa `Aliyyun ma`al haqq) [14] also remains unpublished.

The eleventh part dealing with Hadith al­Muqatalah [15] also remains unpublished. 


The twelfth part deals with Hadith al­Thaqalayn and Hadith al­Safinah. [16] It was published in two big volumes, the first of which in 664 pages appeared in 1314/1896 and the second in 891 pages in 1351/ 1932. 

Sayyid Hamid Husayn and his work `Abaqat have been held in great esteem amongst leading Shi`i scholars and many of them, from Mirza Sayyid Hasan Shirazi, the great marji` and juristic authority of his days, to contemporary scholars, have extolled the author and his great work. Sayyid `Ali Milani, in the first volume of his condensed translation of `Abaqat into Arabic, quotes the statements of various scholars. Here we will confine ourselves to the opinion expressed by the great scholar `Allamah Aqa Buzurg Tehrani, the author of al­Dhari`ah ila tasanif al­Shi`ah, about Sayyid Hamid Husayn and his work. He says about the author: (He is) one of the greatest of Imami theologians (mutakallimun) and one of the greatest and deeply learned of Shi`i scholars who lived in the early part of this century. He was profoundly learned, and had extensive knowledge and mastery over the Islamic traditions and heritage and attained such a station in it that none of his contemporaries or anyone of those who came after him, or even most of the celebrities of the preceding centuries, have been able to attain. He spent his entire noble life in fathoming the mysteries of religiosity and in the defence of Islam and the realm of sincere religion. I don't know of anyone in the latter centuries who waged a jihad like him and sacrificed everything in his possession in the way of everlasting truths. The times, in all ages and periods, will never see a compeer of him in his research, his extensive knowledge, his precision, intelligence, and the immensity of his memory and retention. 
Aqa Buzurg Tehrani says about the `Abaqat: "It is the greatest of books compiled on the subject (ie. Imamate) from the outset of the Islamic era to the present." And what he says about the author and his book is perfectly representative of the opinion of leading Shi`i scholars on this matter. [17]


The Author's Approach in `Abaqat:
`Abaqat al­'anwar was written in Persian because Shah `Abd al`Aziz's Tuhfah, which it refuted, was also in Persian. As mentioned above, Shah `Abd al­`Aziz had cited five verses of the Qur'an and twelve traditions of the Prophet (S) as constituting the basis of Shi`i argument conceming the Imamate of the Imams of the Ahl al­Bayt (A). This was itself a misrepresentation of the Shi`i case, for there are hundreds of verses and traditions, many of which are scattered throughout the Sunni hadith corpus as well as works in tafsir. Even the verses and traditions that he cites are dismissed summarily by him on, as Sayyid Hamid Husayn shows, flimsy and untenable pretexts. 

The published parts of `Abaqat deal with eight of these traditions, each part dealing with the sanad and doctrinal import of one of them. Sayyid Hamid Husayn's approach in each of these parts is to show that the hadith is a mutawatir one, having been narrated by Sunni traditionists of every generation from the time of the Companions to the scholars of his own era. He devotes a section to each of the narrators, quotes the tradition as narrated by him, and cites the opinions of biographers and Sunni authorities of `ilm al­rijal regarding his reliability, trustworthiness and his scholarly station. 

After discussing the sanad aspect of the tradition, he goes on to deal with its meaning, dealing one by one with all the various arguments that have been advanced by Sunni scholars to refute what the Shi`ah assert to be its doctrinal implications. His treatment is so logical, meticulous, precise, thorough and exhaustive that one cannot but be struck with wonder at his prodigious, or rather miraculous, learning and his encompassing mastery over the entire Islamic heritage of thirteen centuries before him which lies in front of him like an open book. 

This sketchy study of `Abaqat relates to its part concerning the Hadith al­Thaqalayn. At first we will give a list of its narrators belonging to every century of the Hijrah calendar. A brief reference is given under the name of each narrator concerning his standing with Sunni authorities on rijal. We have included the names of other narrators from the appendix (mulhaqat) to `Abaqat by Sayyid `Abd al­`Aziz Tabataba'i, which has been included in the condensed Arabic translation by Sayyid `Ali Milani. 

Reprints of most parts of `Abaqat al­'anwar have appeared in Iran. The first section of the first part, dealing with the sanad aspect of Hadith al­Ghadir was published in 1369/1949 in 600 pages from Tehran. The twelfth part, dealing with Hadith al­Thaqalayn and Hadith al­Safinah, was published in six parts and three volumes (vol. 1 in 1379, vol. 2 in 1378­79, and vol. 3 in 1381 and 1382) by Mu'assaseh­ye Nashr­e Nafa'is­e Makhtutat, Isfahan. Madrasat al­'Imam al­Mahdi, Qumm, has published offset reprints of the first Indian lithographed print on the occasion of the author's first death centenary (vol. 3 on Hadith al­Wilayah, 1406; vol. 4 on Hadith al­Tayr, 1405; vol. 5 on Hadith Madinat al­`ilm, 1406; vol. 6 on Hadith al­Tashbih, 1406; vol. 8 on Hadith al­Nur, 1406). `Allamah Shaykh Ghulam Rida Burujerdi has prepared a new edition of the book giving all the necessary references. His edition is under print.

Sayyid `Ali Milani has published ten volumes of Khulasat `Abaqat al­'anwar, which is a condensed translation of the book in Arabic. The first two volumes of his translation, which begins with Hadith al­Thaqalayn, were published in 1398. Bunyad­e Bi'that, Tehran, has published a new edition of the Khulasah, of which ten parts, dealing with Hadith al­Thaqalayn, Hadith al­Safinah, Hadith al­Nur and Hadith al­Ghadir, have appeared. Source: http://www.imamreza.net/eng/imamreza.php?print=678


Selasa, 27 Agustus 2013

JAWABAN HSNDWSP TENTANG BOLEH TIDAKNYA BERPACARAN SEBAGAIMANA LAZIMNYA DIAPLIKASIKAN ORANG NON SYIAH IMAMIAH 12.
















Terjemahan dalam bhs Norway, belum di edit
(Oversettelse Norge, uredigert):


Ikke muslimer konfrontere
HVORFOR ISLAM ikke rettferdig frieri
Som et middel kjent med hverandre
FØR ENTRY
INNHOLDET AV EKTESKAP



ISLAM I ren insan enn si to motsatte SEX SOM BERKHUSUK - SEPI, alene sammen, se gamle GJENSIDIG er forbudt i FRONT OF PUBLIC
(Q.S. En Nur 30, 31)
hsndwsp
Acheh - Sumatra




Bismillaahirrahmaanirrahiim
Jakfari sekt i islam eller sjiaislam preste 12 eller lojal tilhenger Ahlulbayt Profeten saww ingen vilkår frieri (innføring privat uten ekteskap) er ofte praktisert i ikke-shia lokalsamfunn. Men på den annen side, er det nesten umulig å gifte seg med en kvinne med ingen tidligere introduksjon, spesielt de snakker fra hjertet til hjertet som bare involverer to personer. Og Islam bør være i stand til å gi en løsning. Ter midlertidige ekteskap er gode løsninger i denne forbindelse.

Mut'ah er svaret for ikke-muslimer, som de anser islam var svært konservativ med en logisk grunn koker to vesener som ønsker å fortsette ekteskapet gjennomføres uten forhånds tilnærming tilnærming (les frierføtter). Mut'ah er en versjon av "frieri" av islam som er vakrere enn den ikke-Shia frieri, hvor de er i en periode med tilnærmingen ble gratis å ha en mann - kone som ekteskap Bain. Bor lenger ekteskap Mut'ah ikke forpliktet til å gi åndelig og fysisk næring. Men sjenerøs mann som ikke ikke kan forlate sine innkjøp til tjenestemannens kone som en elsker, men egentlig har ikke hatt noen næring. Logisk par frierføtter ikke sjia sjenerøst vil også gjøre det samme som verdien av hengivenhet til sin kjæreste.

Som en svært betydelig forskjell mellom "frieri" Islam (les mut'ah) med ikke frieri Shia Imamate første 12 av disse er lovlig etter Surat an-Nisa 'vers 24, mens den andre er haraam. Den første gratis assosiere som vanlig mann og kone i ekteskapet ba'in mens sistnevnte er ikke bare en stor synd å ha en mann - kone, men også de to-Duan urent.

Tidlig i utviklingen av islam giftemål Mut'a vanligvis brukt av krigere når du er borte fra sin kone. Dette beviser at islam er virkelig en religion Haq med Allah (les innad diina 'indallahil Islam). "Al Islamu ya'lu yukla wala 'alaih" (hadith), hvor islam var ikke tunge til sine tilhengere, og det er alltid en vei ut om det faktisk kom ikke ut på veien. Krigstid æra av Rasulullah er en nødsituasjon, det er nettopp maharnya løst når det er også der oppe i form av en skjorte (hadith). Det kan forstås at dersom medgift ikke løses snart, sannsynligvis ikke løses med tanke på kraft i konstant bevegelse. Mens de dagene sikre midlertidige ekteskap, er medgift ikke nødvendig unntatt når den utløper mut'ahnya, nyakni gå inn i fase bain ekteskap (nikah lese permanent) eller delt antar at i en periode på tilnærming var ikke kommer godt til kona har rett til å nekte å bli videresendt til ekteskapet Bain. Mens ekteskapet ba'in kone ikke har rett til å skille seg fra mannen (les manns høyre er større enn høyre for kona)

Det bør også understrekes at midlertidige ekteskap ble gjort frivillig bør det ikke være noen tvang samt ba'in ekteskap. Fra dumme kokk potensielle kone eller foreldre er villige til midlertidige ekteskap kun innen en uke eller en måned. Dette er hva som gjør islams fiender har mulighet til å beskytte midlertidige ekteskap med den begrunnelse at slike kortsiktige som ekteskapskontrakten er forbudt i islam. Perioden er normalt nok til å bli kjent med hver karakter, minst 2 år. Mens krigs æra av Rasulullah første kan skje innen en uke eller 2,3 dager skjønt. Det er en privilegert steder Fisabilillah jihad Allah og hans sendebud. Hvis det er de som bestrider dette og hevder ingen verdi kvinner, de glemmer hvorfor Gud rettferdiggjør den ekteskape - kona oppnådd mot kvinner i krig som krigsbytte, men hun var også i stor grad fortsatt sin egen mann.

Problemet er, hvorfor de ikke-Shia Imamate 12 Mut'ah tror ekteskapet er forbudt? Svaret er altfor tillitsfulle til Umar bin Khattab. Bare han og deres allierte som våget å motsette bestemmelsene i Allah og hans sendebud hvor følgende informasjon:

Han (Jabir) sa: "Gjennom meg tradisjonen skal komme, vi har gjort sammen Mut'a Profeten (saww) også sammen med Abu Bakr, men etter at regimet til Umar, ble han (Umar) kunngjorde for publikum ved å si:" Se Al- Koranen fast stilling på Koranen er Allahs sendebud (saww) forblir som apostlene, er det to typer mut'ah som eksisterte på tidspunktet for apostelen; Hajj Mut'a (Mut'ah av Hajj Red) og kuharamkan midlertidige ekteskap ". Selv om midlertidige ekteskap forbudt så hvorfor skal vi ikke forby mut'ah pilegrimsreise til denne dag fortsatt praktiseres av alle muslimer i verden når det var inkludert som ble forbudt av Umar bin Khattab.
Proposition andre naqli:
Noen uttrykk for apostlene og Tabi'i ledsagere (som levde etter den tiden av følgesvennene) som eksempler på enkeltpersoner som ville nekte forbudet (forbud) Mut'a:

Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib, som beskrevet av Tabari i sin kommentar bok (se: vol: 5 ting: 9) hvor Imam Ali sa: "hvis det ikke er forbudt ved Umar Mut'a det skulle være noen ekteskapsbrudd med mindre folk er virkelig elendig A ".
Denne historien som bevis på at forbyr mut'ah er Umar bin Khatab, så etter mange tilfeller av utroskap og voldtekt i dag -baserte diatas- historie, inkludert hvem som er ansvarlig for alle hendelser?

Abdullah bin Umar (den andre kalifen sønn), som sitert av Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal i hans Musnad bøker (se: vol: 2 ting: 95) der Abdullah sa når de blir spurt om midlertidige ekteskap: "Ved Allah, når vi dizaman Rasul vi ikke finne folk fornicate eller skjevt ". Da sa han: Jeg har hørt profeten sa: "før kommende av Hour vises masihud-Dajjal og en stor løgner så mange som tretti eller mer". Så hvem er verdig til å bli kalt en løgner i historien over streken? Er det folk som vri loven Rasul praktisk mulig for en løgner?

Abdullah bin Masud, som sitert av al-Bukhari i hans Sahih bøker (se: vol: 7 ting: bokkapittel ekteskap 4: 8 hadith til: 3), hvor Abdullah sa: "når vi kjempet sammen med profeten var vi ikke bringe hva- hva, da vi spurte ham: kan vi gjøre kastrering? Så forbød han oss til å gjøre det da han ga oss tillatelse til å gifte seg med kvinner med medgift klær for en viss periode. På den tiden han leste for oss vers som lyder: "O de som tror dere ikke forby noe bra at Gud har gjort lovlig for deg og du ikke overskrider grensene ..." (Surat Al-Ma'idah: 87)
Som for lovligheten av loven er derfor klart Mut'a gift i Surat an-Nisa 'vers 24: "................................ .................................... Da konene som har deg ni'mati (campuri) i blant dem, gi dem sin medgift (til perfeksjon), som en plikt, det er ikke grunnen til at du kan noe som du har hverandre å la gå, etter å bestemme medgiften det Lo Allah er Vitende, Wise "(Q, S, en Nisa '.! 24)

I en del av sunni geistlige Umar ikke å følge bestemmelsene i bestemmelsene i Allah og Hans Raasul. Er det noen forstandig person mener Umar har rett til å bestemme noe enn Allah? Mens andre sunniledere mener at Umar ikke hadde rett til å avbryte eller oppheve bestemmelsene Allah og Hans sendebud, men de hevder at retten til ekteskap Mut'ah brukt følgesvennene til profeten selv, men det memansuhkannya. Figuren forstår ikke at Koranens vers ikke bør være Diman suhkan av Hadith og profeten selv umulig mot avsetningen av Gud. Avsnitt Koranen kan bare være dimansuhkan med vers Koranen andre som klausuler knyttet til Khamar (les berusende drikke), hvor i begynnelsen Gud forbyr ikke, bli lenger fortelle at vinen den inneholder gode og det onde, men onder større enn godhet. Dette verset dimansuhkan siste avsnitt ned på forbudet mot å drikke vin.

Det er ingen klausul uten engang ett vers som annullere ekteskapet Mut'ah (les en Nisa '24). Men andre sunniledere har allerede nevnt noen vers i sin nøysomme seba gai avsnitt naasikhah (som memansukhkan) avsnitt Mut'ah. Nedenfor vil jeg nevne disse versene.

Første ledd:

Allahs ord:
و الذين هم لفروجهم حافظون إلا على أزواجهم أو ما ملكت أيمانهم, فإنهم غير ملومين. (المؤمنون: 5-6)
"Og de som holder sine kjønnsorganer, unntatt mot sine koner eller deres slavinner; så ja de er i ting ikke å bebreide "(Koranen: 23; 5-6).
Beskrivelse vers:

Etter deres syn forklarer ovenfor avsnitt som tillot / dihalalkanya klikke gauli en kvinne av to grunner;

Først i ekteskapet (permanent).

For det andre, eierskap av slaver.

I mellomtiden sa de kvinner som gifter seg med Mut'ah kontrakt, ikke en kone.

svar:
Først av alt som trenger å bli forstått, er at mut'ah var et bryllup og ekteskap bond, både fra standpunktet av språket, tolkningen av verset og Shari'ah, som tidligere beskrevet. Så han er faktisk i det generelle i avsnittet ovenfor antas å være pemansukh, er det ingen grunn som rettferdiggjør utstedelse av generalitet. Azwaajihim ord i verset ovenfor inkluderer kone som giftet seg bra med ekteskapet seremoni varig (permanent) eller ekteskapskontrakten Mut'ah.

For det andre, i tillegg Surah vers 5-6 Mu'minun (som pemansukh) status Mekka surah (ned før hijra) mens vers Mut'ah lov (vers 24 Surah al-Nisa ') status Madaniyah (droppet etter Hijrah). Så hvordan er det mulig at nedover Mekka surah avsnitt før avsnitt Madaniyah kan memansukhkannya?! Verset dahuluan memansukh ned mer enn verset blir dimansukhkan lov. Kan det være?!

Tredje, Permanent lovfesting av loven om ekteskap Mut'ah er sikkert, som har blitt bekreftet av sunni lærde selv. Az Zamakhsyari menukilIbnu ra.sebagai Abbas sa: «Sannelig, det muhkam Mut'ah vers (ikke mansukh). Den samme uttalelsen kom også fra Ibn Uyainah.

Fjerde, prester Ahlubait som. hevde at loven inneholdt i nevnte punkt skal gjelde, ikke mansukh.

Femte, Vers 5-6 Surah Mu'minun're snakker om en permanent ekteskapsloven i forhold til de handlinger som er forbudt i sharia, som for eksempel utroskap, liwath (homo) eller andre grusomheter. Han snakker ikke om ekteskap Mut'ah, så det antas at det foreligger motstridende mellom de to.

Som for forestillingen om at en kvinne som var gift med Mut'ah ekteskapet ikke var eksistert som isrti, zawjah, så antagelsen er ikke sant. fordi:
1. De sier at dette ekteskapet har dimansukhkan med nr إلا على أزواجهم ... eller vers, eller med sine fortellinger fortalt at Profeten. har memansukhnya etter tidligere menghalalkannya. Er ikke dette all Mut'ah sterke bevis for at det er et ekteskap seremoni?! Er ikke det en erkjennelse av at kvinner som gifter seg med en kontrakt Mut'ah det på er en isrti, zawjah?! Igjen, pemansukhan - i lys av dem, er bevis på at dimansukh det er ekteskapet!

2. Tolkningen av tallene og sunni kommentatorer på vers av Surat An-Nisa 'det spørsmålet er et ekteskap Mut'ah er klare bevis for at kontrakten Mut'ah er en ekteskapskontrakt i islam.

3. Mut'ah har begrunnet sitt ekteskap i løpet av levetiden til Profeten. av muhaddith pålitelig sunni, som Bukhari, Muslim, etc. David Adu.

4. Det er en bestemmelse medgift, er medgift i ekteskapet Mut'ah bevis på at det er en ekteskapskontrakt. Sa أجورهن (Ujuurahunna = sin medgift). Som i andre vers som snakker om ekteskap.

Legg merke til vers 25 av Surah an-Nisa ', vers 50 Surah Al Ahzaab (33) og nr 10 av surah Al Mumtahanah (60). I disse versene ordet أجورهن tolket medgift.

Merk: Formålet med midlertidige ekteskap ekte æra, er vi nå i forberedelse til ekteskap ba-en (varig ekteskap) er ikke å bare ha det gøy til anti-sjiamuslimske Imamate 12 har mulighet til å baktale. Bakvaskelse var sårbar utenfor de landene som ikke islamske systemet. I virkeligheten "Nikah Mut'ah" ikke er misforstått i den islamske republikken Iran. I en ikke System of Islam (les system Taghut), Ba-en-ekteskape også vanlige problemer. Hvor mange menn som lar kvinner forlatt etter mindre enn en måned løpet av ekteskapskontrakten. Hvis staten har rett leder, ansvarlig for å utstede ekteskap (bør det ikke være noen mann som undertrykker sin kone). Så spørsmålet om den islamske Ummah er nå plassert på systemet rådende i hjemlandet (Gud eller Taghut).

Billahi fi sabililhaq
hsndwsp, -
på End of the World


For å legge til innsikt og islamsk litteratur klikk her:
http://www.al-shia.org/html/id/books/Kebenaran-Hilang/index.htm
http://www.al-shia.org/html/id/books/Kebenaran-Hilang/index.htm


Merk:
Zaidi sjiamuslimske og Ismaelis shia og sunni muslimer er uenig med "ekteskap Mut'ah". Grunnen til at de Imam Alipun blitt forbudt av profetens eget vitnesbyrd. Dette kan spores i hadith av Bukhari.

Response: Igjen, de er ikke opptatt av å forstå bestemmelsene i Allah swt som hadith umulig å avbryte "Ayat Allah" (Al Koranen). Hvis de er godkjent mengemukankan hadith Imam Ali, er det sikkert at "Hadith False". Forårsaket millioner hevet falske hadithene av anti Ahlulbayt Rasulullahlah muslimer blir revet fra hverandre i vår tid. De hevder at de er riktige. Hvis de ønsker å gå tilbake til vers Allah å bli forent med oppsatt på å finne sannheten, hva Gud mente med kalamNya, "Wa'tasimu bi hablillah" hvorfor Gud bruker ikke "bi Wa'tasimu dinillah", vil vi også bli forent med bare Ahlulbayt Rasulullahlah som forstår tolkningen "bi Wa'tasimu hablillah" og de som følger Ahlulbayt.

Unity også opprettholdes analyseres på nytt hvorfor "Hadiswt Thaqalayn" nå finnes i to versjoner, som er ekte og som er falsk, produksjon av anti Ahlulbayt:

                                             
Og Tersingkaplah Lie


http://www.al-shia.org/html/id/books/Kebenaran-Hilang/002.htm#link2
http://www.al-shia.org/html/id/books/Kebenaran-Hilang/002.htm#link2 http://achehkarbala.blogspot.no/2013/08/jawaban-hsndwsp-tentang-boleh-tidaknya .html

NON MUSLIMS CONFRONT
WHY ISLAM does not justify courtship
AS A MEANS TO KNOW EACH OTHER
BEFORE ENTRY
LEVELS OF MARRIAGE




ISLAM IN PURE INSAN let alone TWO OPPOSITE SEX THAT ARE BERKHUSUK - SEPI, alone together, SEE OLD MUTUAL ARE PROHIBITED IN FRONT OF PUBLIC
(Q.S. An Nur 30, 31)
hsndwsp
Acheh - Sumatra




Bismillaahirrahmaanirrahiim
Jakfari sect in Islam or Shia Islam priestly 12 or loyal follower Ahlulbayt Prophet saww no terms courtship (introduction privately without marriage) is often practiced in non-Shiite communities. But on the other hand, it is almost impossible to marry a woman with no previous introduction, especially those speaking from the heart to the heart that only involves two people. And Islam should be able to provide a solution. Ter temporary marriages are good solutions in this regard.

Mut'ah is the answer for non-Muslims, which they consider Islam were very conservative with a logical reason, cook two beings who wish to continue their marriage conducted without advance rapprochement approach (read courting). Mut'ah is a version of "courtship" of Islam which is more beautiful than the non-Shia courtship, where they are in a period of rapprochement was free to have a husband - wife as marriage Bain. Staying longer marriage Mut'ah not obliged to provide spiritual and physical sustenance. However generous husband who does not may not leave their shopping to the official's wife as a lover, but really have not had any sustenance. Logically couples courting non Shi'ite generously will also do the same thing as the value of affection to her lover.

As a highly significant difference between the "courtship" Islam (read mut'ah) with non courtship Shia Imamate first 12 of which are lawful by Surat an-Nisa 'verse 24, while the second is haraam. The first free associating as commonly husband and wife in marriage ba'in while the latter is not only a great sin to have a husband - wife but also the two-duan unclean.

Early in the development of Islam married Mut'a generally applied by fighters when away from his wife. This proves that Islam is truly a religion of haq with Allah (read innad diina 'indallahil Islam). "Al Islamu ya'lu yukla wala 'alaih" (hadith), where Islam was not burdensome to their adherents, and there is always a way out if in fact did not come out the way. Wartime era of Rasulullah is an emergency, it is precisely maharnya resolved when it is also up there in the form of a shirt (hadith). It can be understood that if the dowry is not resolved soon, likely not resolved considering the force constantly moving. While the days of secure temporary marriages, dowry is not required except when it expires mut'ahnya, nyakni enter the phase bain marriage (nikah read permanent) or split suppose in a period of rapprochement was not going well until the wife is entitled to refuse to be forwarded to the marriage Bain. While the marriage ba'in wife does not have the right to divorce her husband (read husband's right is greater than the right of the wife)

It should also be underlined that temporary marriages was done voluntarily there should be no compulsion as well as ba'in marriage. From the stupid cook prospective wife or parents are willing to temporary marriages only within one week or one month. This is what makes the enemies of Islam have the opportunity to patronize temporary marriages on the grounds that such short-term as the marriage contract is forbidden in Islam. The period is normal enough to get to know each character, at least 2 years. While the wartime era of Rasulullah first could happen within a week or even 2.3 days though. It is a privileged interests fisabilillah jihad Allah and His Apostle. If there are those who dispute this arguing no value women, they forget why God would justify the conjugal - wife obtained against women in war as booty, but she was also largely still have her own husband.

The problem is, why the non-Shia Imamate 12 Mut'ah think marriage is forbidden? The answer is too trusting to Umar bin Khattab. Only he and their allies who dared to oppose the provisions of Allah and His Apostle where the following information:

He (Jabir) said: "Through me the tradition is to come, we have done together Mut'a Prophet (saww) also together with Abu Bakr, but after the reign of Umar, he (Umar) was announced to the public by saying:" Look Al- Qur'an fixed position as of the Qur'an is the Messenger of Allah (saww) remains as the Apostles, there are two types of mut'ah that existed at the time of the Apostle; Hajj Mut'a (Mut'ah of Hajj Red) and kuharamkan temporary marriages ". Even if temporary marriages forbidden then why do we not forbid mut'ah pilgrimage to this day still practiced by all Muslims the world when it was included that was prohibited by Umar bin Khattab.
Proposition other naqli:
Some expressions of the Apostles and tabi'in companions (who lived after the time of the Companions) as examples of individuals who would deny the prohibition (prohibition) Mut'a:

Imam Ali bin Abi Talib, as disclosed by Tabari in his commentary book (see: vol: 5 things: 9) where Imam Ali said, "if it is not prohibited by Umar Mut'a there would be no adultery unless people are really wretched A ".
This history as evidence that forbids mut'ah is Umar bin Khatab, then after many cases of adultery and rape today -based diatas- history including who is responsible for all the events?

Abdullah bin Umar (the second caliph's son), as quoted by Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal in his Musnad books (see: vol: 2 things: 95) in which Abdullah said when asked about temporary marriages: "By Allah, when we dizaman Rasul did not we find people fornicate or askew ". Then he said, I have heard the Prophet said: "before the coming of the Hour will appear masihud-Dajjal and a big liar as many as thirty or more". So who is worthy to be called a liar in history over the line? Are there people who twist the law Rasul practically feasible for a liar?

Abdullah bin Masud, as quoted by al-Bukhari in his Saheeh books (see: vol: 7 things: marriage book chapter 4: 8 hadith to: 3), where Abdullah said: "when we fought alongside the Prophet was we did not bring what- what, then we asked him: may we do castration? Then he forbade us to do so then he gave us permission to marry women with dowries clothes for a certain period of time. At that time he read to us the verse that reads: "O those who believe you guys do not forbid anything good that God has made lawful for you and you do not exceed the limits ..." (Surat Al-Ma'idah: 87)
As for the legality of the law is thus clear Mut'a married in Surat an-Nisa 'verse 24: "................................ .................................... Then the wives who have you ni'mati (campuri) in among them, give them her dowry (to perfection), as an obligation; There is not why for you to something that you have each other to let go, after determining the dowry it. Lo! Allah is Knower, Wise "(Q, S, an Nisa ' 24)

In a proportion of Sunni cleric Umar not adhering to the provisions of the provisions of Allah and His Raasul. Is there any sane person considers Umar is entitled to decide something than Allah? While other Sunni leaders believe that Umar was not entitled to cancel or annul provisions Allah and His messenger, but they argue that the right of marriage Mut'ah applied the Companions of the Prophet himself but that memansuhkannya. The figure does not understand that the Qur'anic verse should not be Diman suhkan by the Hadith and the Prophet himself impossible against the provision of God. Paragraph Qur'an can only be dimansuhkan with the verse Qur'an others as paragraph relating to Khamar (read intoxicating drink), where in the beginning God does not forbid, stay longer tell that the wine it contains good and evil but evils greater than kind. That verse dimansuhkan the last paragraph down on the prohibition of drinking wine.

There is no clause without even one verse which annul marriage Mut'ah (read an Nisa '24). But other Sunni leaders have already mentioned some verses in their frugal seba gai paragraph naasikhah (which memansukhkan) paragraph Mut'ah. Below I will mention those verses.

First paragraph:

Word of Allah:
و الذين هم لفروجهم حافظون إلا على أزواجهم أو ما ملكت أيمانهم, فإنهم غير ملومين. (المؤمنون: 5-6)
"And those who keep their genitals, except against their wives or their right hands possess; then indeed they are in things not to be blamed. "(Qur'an: 23; 5-6)
Description verse:

In their view the above paragraph explains that allowed / dihalalkanya clicking gauli a woman for two reasons;

First, the marriage relationship (permanent).

Second, ownership of slaves.

In the meantime they said women who marry with Mut'ah contract, not a wife.

Response:
First of all that needs to be understood is that mut'ah was a wedding and the marriage bond, both from the standpoint of language, the interpretation of the verse and the Shari'ah, as previously described. So he is actually in the generality of paragraph above are assumed to be pemansukh, there is no reason that justifies the issuance of generality. Azwaajihim word in the verse above includes wife who married well with the marriage ceremony enduring (permanent) or the marriage contract Mut'ah.

Second, in addition Surah verses 5-6 Mu'minun (as pemansukh) status Meccan surah (down before the Hijrah) while verses Mut'ah law (verse 24 Surah al-Nisa ') status Madaniyah (dropped after Hijrah). Then how is it possible that down the Meccan surah paragraph before paragraph Madaniyah can memansukhkannya ?! The verse dahuluan memansukh down more than the verse being dimansukhkan law. Could it be?!

Third, Permanent enactment of the law of marriage Mut'ah is certain, as has been affirmed by the Sunni scholars themselves. Az Zamakhsyari menukilIbnu ra.sebagai Abbas said, "Surely it muhkam Mut'ah verse (not mansukh). The same statement also came from Ibn Uyainah.

Fourth, the Priests Ahlubait as. assert that the law contained in that paragraph shall remain in force, not mansukh.

Fifth, Verses 5-6 Surah Mu'minun're talking about a permanent marriage law compared to the actions that are forbidden in the Shari'a, such as adultery, liwath (homo) or other atrocities. He is not talking about marriage Mut'ah, so it is assumed the existence of conflicting between the two.

As for the notion that a woman who was married with Mut'ah marriage was not existed as isrti, zawjah, then the assumption is not true. Because:
1. They say that this marriage has dimansukhkan with paragraph إلا على أزواجهم ... or verses, or with their narrations narrated that the Prophet. has memansukhnya after previously menghalalkannya. Is not this all Mut'ah strong evidence that it is a marriage ceremony ?! Is not that the recognition that women who marry with a contract Mut'ah it on is a isrti, zawjah ?! Once again, the pemansukhan - in the view of them-is proof that the dimansukh it is marriage!

2. The interpretation of the figures and the Sunni commentators on the verse of Surat An-Nisa 'that question is a marriage Mut'ah is clear evidence that the contract Mut'ah is a marriage contract in Islam.

3. Mut'ah have justified their marriage during the lifetime of the Prophet. by muhaddith reliable Sunni, like Bukhari, Muslim, etc. David Adu.

4. There is a provision dowry, dowry in marriage Mut'ah is proof that it is a marriage contract. Said أجورهن (Ujuurahunna = their dowry). As in other verses that talk about marriage.

Notice verse 25 of Surah an-Nisa ', verse 50 Surah Al Ahzaab (33) and paragraph 10 of surah Al Mumtahanah (60). In these verses the word أجورهن interpreted dowry.

Note: The purpose of temporary marriages real era, we are now in preparation for marriage ba-en (permanent marriage) is not to just have fun until the anti-Shiite Imamate 12 have the opportunity to slander. Slander was vulnerable outside the countries non Islamic system. In reality, "Nikah Mut'ah" is not misunderstood in the Islamic Republic of Iran. In a non System of Islam (read system Taghut), Ba-en-marital also common problems. How many men who let women abandoned after less than one month course of the marriage contract. If the state has the right leader, responsible to issue marriage (there should be no husband who is oppressing his wife). So the issue of the Islamic Ummah is now located on the system prevailing in their country (God or Taghut).

Billahi fi sabililhaq
hsndwsp, -
at the End of the World


To add insight and Islamic literatures click here:
http://www.al-shia.org/html/id/books/Kebenaran-Hilang/index.htm
http://www.al-shia.org/html/id/books/Kebenaran-Hilang/index.htm


Note:
Zaidi Shiite and Ismaelis Shia and Sunni Muslims disagree with the "marriage Mut'ah". The reason they Imam Alipun been forbidden by the Prophet's own testimony. This can be tracked in the hadith of Bukhari.

Response: Again, they are not keen to understand the provisions of Allah swt that Hadeeth impossible to cancel "Ayat Allah" (Al Qur'an). If they are approved mengemukankan hadith Imam Ali, it is certain that "Hadith False". Caused millions raised false Hadiths by the anti Ahlulbayt Rasulullahlah Muslims are torn apart in our time. They claim that they are correct. If they want to go back to the verse Allah to be united with the intent on finding the truth, what God meant by kalamnya, "Wa'tasimu bi hablillah" why God does not use "bi Wa'tasimu dinillah", we will also be united with only Ahlulbayt Rasulullahlah who understand interpretation "bi Wa'tasimu hablillah" and those who follow Ahlulbayt.

Unity also be maintained reanalyzed why "Hadiswt Thaqalayn" now exists in two versions, which are genuine and which are false, the production of the anti Ahlulbayt:

                                             
And Tersingkaplah Lie


http://www.al-shia.org/html/id/books/Kebenaran-Hilang/002.htm#link2
http://www.al-shia.org/html/id/books/Kebenaran-Hilang/002.htm#link2 http://achehkarbala.blogspot.no/2013/08/jawaban-hsndwsp-tentang-boleh-tidaknya .html


Google Oversetter for bedrift:Verktøysett for oversettereNettstedoversetterGlobal Market Finder




NON MUSLIM MEMPERTANYAKAN
KENAPA ISLAM TIDAK MEMBENARKAN PACARAN
SEBAGAI SARANA UNTUK SALING MENGENAL
SEBELUM MASUK
JENJANG PERKAWINAN


DALAM ISLAM MURNI JANGANKAN DUA INSAN YANG YANG BERLAWANAN JENIS KELAMIN BERKHUSUK - SEPI, BERDUA-DUAAN, SALING MEMANDANG LAMA SAJA DI DEPAN PUBLIK DILARANG
(Q.S. An Nur 30, 31)
hsndwsp
Acheh - Sumatera





Bismillaahirrahmaanirrahiim
Dalam Islam Mazhab Jakfari atau Islam Syiah Imamiah 12 atau pengikut setia Ahlulbayt Rasulullah saww tidak ada istilah pacaran (perkenalan secara pribadi tanpa ikatan pernikahan) yang sering dipraktekkan dalam komunitas non Syiah . Namun di sisi lain, hampir mustahil menikahi seorang wanita tanpa perkenalan sebelumnya, terkhusus berbicara dari hati ke hati yang hanya melibatkan dua orang saja. Dan agama Islam harus mampu memberikan solusinya. Nikah mut’ah adalah solusi ter baik dalam hal ini.

Mut'ah adalah jawabannya buat orang non Muslim, dimana mereka menganggap Islam itu kolot dengan alasan yang logis, masak dua insan yang hendak melanjutkan perkawinannya dilaksanakan tanpa pendekatan persesuaian terlebih dahulu (baca pacaran). Mut'ah adalah versi "pacarannya" Islam dimana lebih indah daripada pacaran non Syiah, dimana mereka dalam masa persesuaian itu bebas melakukan hubungan suami - isteri sebagaimana nikah Bain. Tinggal lagi nikah Mut'ah tidak wajib memberikan nafkah lahir dan bathin. Namun suami yang murah hati tidak mungkin tidak memberikan belanjanya kepada sang Isteri sebagai kekasih yang resmi, kecuali memang benar-benar belum punya rezki. Logisnya pasangan pacaran non Syiah yang murah hati juga akan melakukan hal yang sama sebagai nilai kasih sayangnya kepada sang kekasih.

Adapun perbedaan yang sangat signifikan antara "pacaran" Islam (baca mut'ah) dengan pacaran non Syiah Imamiah 12 diantaranya yang pertama hukumnya halal berdasarkan surah an Nisa' ayat 24, sedangkan yang ke dua hukumnya haram. Yang pertama bebas bergaul sebagaimana lazimnya suami- isteri dalam nikah ba'in sedangkan yang kedua bukan saja dosa besar melakukan hubungan suami - isteri tetapi juga haram berdua-duan.

Diawal perkembangan Islam kawin mut'ah pada umumnya diaplikasikan oleh pejuang ketika jauh dari isterinya. Ini membuktikan bahwa Islam itu benar-benar agama yang haq disisi Allah (baca innad diina 'indallahil Islam). "Al Islamu ya'lu wala yukla 'alaih" (hadist), dimana Islam itu tidak memberatkan pemeluknya dan senantiasa ada jalan keluarnya asal saja tidak keluar jalan. Masa Perang jaman Rasulullah adalah masa darurat, justeru itu maharnya diselesaikan ketika itu juga hingga ada yang berupa sebuah baju (hadist). Hal ini dapat dipahami bahwa apabila tidak diselesaikan maharnya dengan segera, besar kemungkinan tidak terselesaikan mengingat pasukan tersebut senantiasa berpindah-pindah. Sedangkan nikah mut'ah dimasa aman, tidak disyaratkan maharnya kecuali ketika habis masa mut'ahnya, nyakni memasuki fase nikah bain (baca nikah permanent) atau berpisah andaikata dalam masa persesuaian itu tidak berjalan dengan baik hingga isteri berhak menolak untuk diteruskan ke nikah Bain. Sedangkan dalam nikah ba'in isteri tidak memiliki hak untuk menceraikan suami (baca hak suami lebih besar dari hak isteri)

Perlu juga digarisbawahi bahwa nikah mut'ah itu dilakukan secara suka-rela tidak boleh ada paksaan sebagaimana juga nikah ba'in. Dari itu masak bodoh calon isteri atau orang tuanya bersedia nikah mut'ah hanya dalam jangka satu minggu atau satu bulan. Inilah yang membuat musuh Islam berkesempatan untuk merendahkan nikah mut'ah dengan alasan jangka yang demikian pendek sebagaimana kawin kontrak yang terlarang dalam Islam. Jangka waktunya yang normal cukup untuk saling mengenal watak masing-masing, minimal 2 tahun. Sedangkan masa perang jaman Rasulullah dulu bisa saja terjadi dalam tempo satu minggu atau malah 2,3 hari sekalipun. Itu adalah kepentingan jihad fisabilillah yang diistimewakan Allah dan Rasul Nya. Kalau ada pihak yang mempersoalkan hal ini dengan alasan tidak ada nilai orang perempuan, mereka lupa kenapa Allah membenarkan melakukan hubungan suami - isteri terhadap perempuan yang didapat dalam peperangan sebagai harta rampasan, padahal perempuan itu juga sebahagian besar masih memiliki suaminya sendiri.

Persoalannya, kenapa orang non Syiah Imamiah 12 mengira nikah Mut'ah itu haram? Jawabannya adalah terlalu percaya kepada Umar bin Khattab. Hanya dialah dan konco-konconya yang berani melawan ketentuan Allah dan Rasul Nya sebagai mana keterangan berikut ini:

Ia (Jabir) mengatakan: “Melalui diriku hadis tersebut didapat, kita telah melakukan mut’ah bersama Rasulullah (saww) juga bersama Abu bakar, akan tetapi setelah berkuasanya Umar, ia (Umar) pun mengumumkannya pada masyarakat dengan ucapan: “Sesungguhnya Al-Qur’an tetap posisinya sebagai Al-Qur’an sedang Rasulullah (saww) tetap sebagai Rasul, ada dua jenis mut’ah yang ada pada zaman Rasul; haji mut’ah (haji tamattu’ .red) dan nikah mut’ah kuharamkan”. Kalaupun nikah mut’ah haram lantas kenapa kita juga tidak mengharamkan mut’ah haji yang sampai detik ini masih dilakukan oleh semua kaum muslimin dunia padahal ia termasuk yang diharamkan oleh Umar bin Khattab.
Dalil naqli lainnya:
Beberapa ungkapan para sahabat Rasul dan para tabi’in (yang hidup setelah zaman para sahabat) sebagai contoh pribadi-pribadi yang mengingkari akan pelarangan (pengharaman) mut’ah:

Imam Ali bin Abi Thalib, sebagaimana diungkapakan oleh Thabari dalam kitab tafsirnya (lihat: jil:5 hal:9) dimana Imam Ali bersabda: “jika mut’ah tidak dilarang oleh Umar niscaya tidak akan ada yang berzina kecuali orang yang benar-benar celaka saja”.
Riwayat ini sebagai bukti bahwa yang mengharamkan mut’ah adalah Umar bin Khatab, lantas setelah banyaknya kasus perzinaan dan pemerkosaan sekarang ini –berdasarkan riwayat diatas- siapakah yang termasuk bertanggungjawab atas semua peristiwa itu?

Abdullah bin Umar bin Khatab (putera khalifah kedua), sebagaimana yang dinukil oleh Imam Ahmad bin Hambal dalam kitab musnadnya (lihat: jil:2 hal:95) dimana Abdullah berkata ketika ditanya tentang nikah mut’ah: “Demi Allah, sewaktu kita dizaman Rasul tidak kita dapati orang berzina ataupun serong”. Kemudian berkata, aku pernah mendengar Rasul bersabda: “sebelum datangnya hari kiamat akan muncul masihud-dajjal dan pembohong besar sebanyak tiga puluh orang atau lebih”. Lantas siapakah yang layak disebut pembohong dalam riwayat diatas tadi? Adakah orang yang memutar balikkan syariat Rasul layak untuk dibilang pembohong?

Abdullah bin Masud, sebagaimana yang dinukil oleh al-Bukhari dalam kitab shahihnya (lihat: jil:7 hal:4 kitab nikah bab:8 hadis ke:3), dimana Abdullah berkata: “sewaktu kita berperang bersama Rasulullah sedang kita tidak membawa apa-apa, lantas kita bertanya kepada beliau: bolehkah kita lakukan pengebirian? Lantas beliau melarang kita untuk melakukannya kemudian beliau memberi izin kita untuk menikahi wanita dengan mahar baju untuk jangka waktu tertentu. Saat itu beliau membacakan kepada kami ayat yang berbunyi: “wahai orang-orang yang beriman janganlah kalian mengharamkan apa-apa yang baik yang telah Allah halalkan bagi kalian dan janganlah kalian melampaui batas…”(Qs Al-Ma’idah:87)
Adapun legalitas hukumnya kawin mut'ah demikian jelas dalam surah an Nisa' ayat 24: ".................................................................... Maka isteri-isteri yang telah kamu ni'mati (campuri) di antara mereka, berikanlah kepada mereka maharnya (dengan sempurna), sebagai suatu kewajiban; dan tiadalah mengapa bagi kamu terhadap sesuatu yang kamu telah saling merelakannya, sesudah menentukan mahar itu . Sesungguhnya Allah Maha Mengetahui lagi Maha Bijaksana" (Q,S. an Nisa' 24)

Sebahagian tokoh Sunni berpegang pada ketentuan Umar bukan ketentuan Allah dan Raasul Nya. Adakah orang yang waras menganggap Umar lebih berhak menentukan sesuatu daripada Rasulullah? Sementara tokoh Sunni lainnya meyakini bahwa Umar tidak berhak membatalkan atau memansuhkan Ketentuan Allah dan Rasulnya, namun mereka berkilah bahwa benar nikah Mut'ah di aplikasikan para shahabat akan tetapi Rasulullah sendiri yang memansuhkannya. Tokoh tersebut tidak memahami bahwa Ayat Qur-an tidak boleh diman suhkan oleh Hadist dan bagi Rasulullah sendiri mustahil melawan ketentuan Allah. Ayat Qur-an hanya dapat dimansuhkan dengan ayat Qur-an yang lainnya sebagaimana ayat yang berhubungan dengan Khamar (baca minuman yang memabukkan), dimana pada mulanya Allah tidak mengharamkan, tinggal lagi memberitahukan bahwa pada khamar itu mengandung kebaikan dan keburukan tetapi keburukan lebih besar dari kebaikan. Ayat tersebut dimansuhkan dengan ayat terakhir turun mengenai larangan minum khamar.

Tidak ada satu ayatpun yang memansuhkan ayat nikah Mut'ah (baca an Nisa' 24). Namun Para tokoh Sunni lainnya telah menyebutkan beberapa ayat yang dalam hemat mereka seba gai ayat naasikhah (yang memansukhkan) ayat Mut’ah. Di bawah ini akan saya sebutkan ayat-ayat tersebut.

Ayat Pertama:

Firman Allah SWT:
و الذين هُمْ لِفُرُوْجِهِمْ حافِظُونَ إلاَّ علىَ أَزْواجِهِمْ أَوْ ما مَلَكَتْ أَيْمانُهُمْ، فَإِنَّهُمْ غيرُ مَلُوْمِيْنَ. (المؤمنون:5-6)
“Dan orang-orang yang menjaga kemaluannya, kecuali terhadap isteri-isteri mereka atau budak yang mereka miliki; maka sesungguhnya mereka dalam hal yang tiada tercela.” (QS:23;5-6)
Keterangan Ayat:

Dalam pandangan mereka ayat di atas menerangkan bahwa dibolehkan/ dihalalkanya meng gauli seorang wanita karena dua sebab;

Pertama, hubungan pernikahan (permanen).

Kedua, kepemilikan budak.

Sementara itu kata mereka wanita yang dinikahi dengan akad Mut’ah, bukan seorang istri.

Tanggapan:
Pertama-tama yang perlu difahami ialah bahwa mut’ah adalah sebuah ikatan pernikahan dan perkawinan, baik dari sudut pandang bahasa, tafsir ayat maupun syari’at, seperti telah dijelaskan sebelumnya. Jadi ia sebenarnya dalam keumuman ayat di atas yang diasumsikan sebagai pemansukh, tidak ada alasan yang membenarkan dikeluarkannya dari keumuman tersebut. Kata Azwaajihim dalam ayat di atas mencakup istri yang dinikahi baik dengan akad nikah daim (permanent) maupun akad nikah Mut’ah.

Kedua, selain itu ayat 5-6 Surah Mu’minun (sebagai pemansukh) berstatus Makkiyah (turun sebelum Hijrah) sementara ayat hukum Mut’ah (ayat 24 surah al-Nisa’) berstatus Madaniyah (turun setelah Hijrah). Lalu bagaimana mungkin ayat Makkiyah yang turun sebelum ayat Madaniyah dapat memansukhkannya?! Ayat yang memansukh turun lebih dahuluan dari ayat yang sedang dimansukhkan hukumnya. Mungkinkah itu?!

Ketiga, Tetap diberlakukannya hukum nikah Mut’ah adalah hal pasti, seperti telah ditegaskan oleh para ulama Sunni sendiri. Az zamakhsyari menukilIbnu Abbas ra.sebagai mengatakan, “Sesungguhnya ayat Mut’ah itu muhkam (tidak mansukh). Pernyataan yang sama juga datang dari Ibnu Uyainah.

Keempat, Para Imam Ahlubait as. menegaskan bahwa hukum yang terkandung dalam ayat tersebut tetap berlaku, tidak mansukh.

Kelima, Ayat 5-6 Surah Mu’minun sedang berbicara tentang hukum nikah permanent dibanding tindakan-tindakan yang diharamkan dalam Syari’at Islam, seperti perzinahan, liwath (homo) atau kekejian lain. Ia tidak sedang berbicara tentang nikah Mut’ah, sehingga diasumsikan adanya saling bertentangan antara keduanya.

Adapun anggapan bahwa seorang wanita yang dinikahi dengan nikah Mut’ah itu bukan berstatus sebagai isrti, zawjah, maka anggapan itu tidak benar. Sebab:
1. Mereka mengatakan bahwa nikah ini telah dimansukhkan dengan ayat إلاَّ علىَ أَزْواجِهِمْ … atau ayat-ayat lain atau dengan riwayat-riwayat yang mereka riwayatkan bahwa Nabi saww. telah memansukhnya setelah sebelumnya pernah menghalalkannya. Bukankah ini semua bukti kuat bahwa Mut’ah itu adalah sebuah akad nikah?! Bukankah itu pengakuan bahwa wanita yang dinikahi dengan akad Mut’ah itu adalahh seorang isrti, zawjah?! Sekali lagi, terjadinya pemansukhan – dalam pandangan mereka- adalah bukti nyata bahwa yang dimansukh itu adalah nikah!

2. Tafsiran para tokoh dan para mufassir Sunni terhadap ayat surah An Nisaa’ bahwa yang dimaksud adalah nikah Mut’ah adalah bukti nyata bahwa akad Mut’ah adalah akad nikah dalam Islam.

3. Nikah Mut’ah telah dibenarkan adanya di masa hidup Nabi saww. oleh para muhaddis terpercaya Sunni, seperti Bukhari, Muslim, Adu Daud dll.

4. Ada ketetapan emas kawin, mahar dalam nikah Mut’ah adalah bukti bahwa ia adalah sebuah akad nikah. Kata أُجُوْرَهُنَّ (Ujuurahunna=mahar mereka). Seperti juga pada ayat-ayat lain yang berbicara tentang pernikahan.

Perhatikan ayat 25 surah An Nisaa’, ayat 50 surah Al Ahzaab (33) dan ayat 10 surah Al Mumtahanah (60). Pada ayat-ayat tersebut kata أُجُوْرَهُنَّ diartikan mahar.


Note:  Tujuan nikah mut'ah yang sesungguhnya dizaman kita sekarang untuk persiapan nikah ba-en (nikah permanen) bukan untuk sekedar bersenang-senang hingga orang yang anti Syi'ah Imamiah 12 memiliki kesempatan untuk melakukan fitnah.  Fitnah itu rentan di luar negara yang non system Islam. Realitanya "Nikah Mut'ah" tidak disalah pahami di Republik Islam Iran.  Di negara non System Islam (baca system Taghut), nikah Ba-en juga kerap terjadi permasalahan. Betapa banyak lelaki yang membiarkan wanita terbengkalai setelah kurang dari satu bulan berlangsungnya akad nikah. Andaikata negara memiliki pemimpin yang benar, bertanggung jawab sampai persoalan perkawinan (tidak boleh ada Suami yang menzalimi isterinya). So persoalan ummat Islam sekarang terletak pada system yang berlaku dalam negara mereka (Allah atau Taghut).

Billahi fi sabililhaq
hsndwsp,-
di Ujung Dunia



Untuk menambah wawasan dan khazanah Islam klik disini:
http://www.al-shia.org/html/id/books/Kebenaran-Hilang/index.htm
http://www.al-shia.org/html/id/books/Kebenaran-Hilang/index.htm


Note:
Zaidi Syiah dan Ismaelis Syiah dan Muslim Sunni tidak setuju dengan "nikah Mut'ah". Alasan mereka Imam Alipun telah mengharamkan berdasarkan keterangan Rasulullah sendiri. Ini dapat dilacak dalam hadist Bukhari.

Tanggapan: Lagi-lagi mereka tidak jeli memahami ketentuan Allah swt bahwa Hadist mustahil dapat membatalkan "Ayat Allah" (al Qur-an). Kalau mereka mengemukankan hadist yang disetujui Imam Ali, dapat dipastikan itu "Hadist Palsu". Disebabkan berjuta dimunculkan Hadist palsu oleh kaum yang anti Ahlulbayt Rasulullahlah Ummat Islam tercabik-cabik di zaman kita ini. Mereka mengklaim bahwa merekalah yang benar. Andaikata mereka mau kembali kepada ayat Allah swt agar bersatu dengan bersungguh-sungguh mencari kebenaran, apa yang Allah maksudkan dengan kalamnya, "Wa'tasimu bi hablillah", kenapa Allah tidak menggunakan "Wa'tasimu bi dinillah", kitapun akan bisa bersatu dimana hanya Ahlulbayt Rasulullahlah yang memahami tafsir "Wa'tasimu bi hablillah" dan orang-orang yang mengikuti Ahlulbayt.

Persatuan juga bisa terpelihara dengan menganalisa kembali kenapa "Hadiswt Tsaqalain" sekarang ada dalam 2 versi, mana yang asli dan mana yang palsu, produksi kaum yang anti Ahlulbayt:

                                               

Dan Tersingkaplah Kebohongan


http://www.al-shia.org/html/id/books/Kebenaran-Hilang/002.htm#link2

http://www.al-shia.org/html/id/books/Kebenaran-Hilang/002.htm#link2 http://achehkarbala.blogspot.no/2013/08/jawaban-hsndwsp-tentang-boleh-tidaknya.html